|
NEW POPE FACES
LONG-STANDING ABUSE PROBLEM
May 16, 2005
No one is better informed than
current Pope Benedict XVI regarding sexual abuse
of minors by Catholic priests, or better
qualified to punish the perpetrators and prevent
any future recurrence of these crimes. The
question is, will Joseph Ratzinger have the
courage and moral decisiveness to do so? This is
a new Pope who is facing an abuse problem that is
nothing new.
As
Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith, then-Cardinal Ratzinger initiated in
2001 a review and investigation of all the sexual
abuse cases involving the Catholic Church. As
reported by The New York Times, every
Friday morning, Ratzinger could be found
reviewing sex abuse cases directed to him by
bishops from all over the world. It was, as he
called it, his “Friday penance.”
However, that “penance” was done in secret. The
cases were reviewed in strict confidence and very
few made it to the public arena. That is, not
until 2002, with the eruption of the sex abuse
scandal in the Catholic Church in the United
States.
To
contend with the crisis, the National Conference
of Catholic Bishops formed an investigative panel
which made a discovery of monstrous proportions:
Since 1950 and up to that time, no less than
4,392 priests had raped and sexually abused
10,667 children and adolescents.
Once
the scandal had broken in the news media
worldwide, Cardinal Ratzinger opted for attacking
the U.S. press, rather than championing the
victims.
“In
the United States, there is constant news on this
topic, but less that 1 percent of priests are
guilty of acts of this type,” Ratzinger said in a
2002 visit to Spain. “Therefore, one comes to the
conclusion that it is intentional, manipulated -
that there is a desire to discredit the Church.”
Ratzinger, however, was mistaken. Release of the
National Conference of Catholic Bishops’ report
brought out that fully four percent of all
priests—and not the 1 percent referred to by
Ratzinger—had been involved in one type or
another of sex abuse against minors. The current
Pope neither apologized for, nor did he publicly
retract his accusations against the U.S. press.
Moreover, rather than going public with the names
of all the criminal priests and handing them over
to the law, Ratzinger made the decision to keep
them under wraps. Large numbers of these
priests, far from ending up in jail, were instead
transferred to other parishes, with no warning to
those communities of their menace. It would seem
that for the Vatican, protecting its priests was
paramount to protecting the victims of their
abuse.
The
danger posed by such a systematic lack of
disclosure is that it may have extended as well
to sex abuse cases in other parts of the world.
Two incidences in Latin America merit our
attention.
Enrique Delgado, a
Catholic priest acclaimed for sermons televised
throughout Costa Rica, was sentenced to 21 years
in jail for sexually abusing children in the
Parish of Alajuela, not far from the Costa Rican
capital of San José. Why did the Church not
report this case on its own, waiting instead for
the Costa Rican justice system to bring the
charges?
The
second case involves Legion of Christ founder
Marcial Maciel. At the beginning of December
2004 and predating the death of Pope John Paul
II, Joseph Ratzinger made the decision to open an
investigation into accusations that Father Maciel
had sexually abused at least eight students over
a period of two decades, dating back to 1943.
Because the matter is being handled in the utmost
secrecy, there is no way of reckoning what the
outcome will be of this investigation of the
85-year-old priest, now living in Rome. However,
Alejandro Espinosa’s The Legionnaire,
published in Spanish in 2003 by Grijalbo,
provides a telling account of some of the abuse
that is under investigation.
The
cases of Father Delgado and Father Maciel beg the
question as to whether or not sexual abuse by
priests in Latin America is more prevalent than
what the Catholic Church has already acknowledged
to the public. If 4 percent of all priests in
the U.S. have been involved in sexual abuse cases
over the last half-century, are the numbers
similar in Latin America, Europe, Asia and
Africa? There is no way for us to tell. But
the new Pope does know, and were he willing to do
so, Pope Benedict XVI would be the one to say.
To
Joseph Ratzinger accrues the solemn burden of
ridding the Catholic Church of criminals lurking
under cover of the cassock. He is privy to the
names of all those priests who have violated and
sexually abused children in whatever part of the
world they may be. If he is to set out on his
papacy on the right foot and restore to the
Church the credibility it lost as a result of
this scandal, Benedict XVI can make the good
example of puting all these rapists behind bars.
But will he?
Postscript: The
Vatican has set up an e-mail address for
well-wishers to send messages to the new Pope.
It also serves as an excellent means for the
Spanish-speaking world to apprise Pope Benedict
XVI as to what we think of sexual abuse by
priests in Latin America. The address is benedictoxvi@vatican.va |