It could happen to us at
any time. You board a
plane, a guy sets off a
bomb, and boom! _ it's all
over.
That is the threat
of terrorism. It can happen
to anyone. And that is the
real war that needs to be
won. The one in Iraq is a
different story _ we will
get to that in a little
while.
However, let's start
with the most basic thing.
Among people who travel a
lot _ and I am afraid I
have to include myself in
that category _ there are
only two kinds of baggage:
the ones you take on board
as carry-ons ... and the
ones that get lost.
I have a rule, as many
travelers do, to travel
with only what I can pack
in a carry-on bag. If it
doesn't fit, I don't take
it. And everything I do
take comes with me in the
plane's cabin. I have
traveled like that from
India and China to Thailand
and Australia.
I am no exception. It is
better to wear your socks
and shirts twice than to
have to wait for hours
checking in your suitcase
at the airport and
retrieving it upon arrival
at your destination. That
is, of course, if it does
arrive. I recently read an
article about all the bags
and items that end up being
lost at airports and
they're enough to fill a
museum.
After the discovery of
the plot to blow up 10
airplanes from London bound
for three American cities _
Washington, New York and
Los Angeles _ traveling has
become even more
complicated. It is no
longer possible to take
liquids with you: drinking
water, eye drops,
toothpaste, deodorants,
creams... And in every
airport the forbidden items
are different. You cannot
travel with a cell phone,
iPod or computer in London.
In Miami, you can. And in
Latin America, they don't
even know yet what to do.
It depends on the agent you
get.
Besides the fact that
traveling is not a pleasure
anymore, the real question
is whether we are going to
get to our destinations
alive.
Traveling with my son, I
made connections at
London's Heathrow Airport
to get to and from the
Soccer World Cup in
Germany. My daughter made
the same trip a few weeks
later and my mother will do
it in a few days. Any of
the four of us could be a
victim of a bombing on a
plane in flight. That is
the terror of flying.
And that, the war
against terror, is the one
worth fighting. We cannot
be prisoners of a group of
deranged people who, out of
religious fanaticism and
brainwashing, are willing
to commit suicide and take
countless people down with
them. And all that with the
promise of finding 60 or so
virgins in heaven.
I still recall, not
without nostalgia, the
times when terrorists were
afraid of dying. I can
still remember that, when
they hijacked airplanes,
police and teams of
negotiators assumed that
the terrorist wanted to
live.
Not anymore.
What surprises me most
in these terrorism times is
that there are so many
young people willing to
become martyrs and die for
reasons that others, more
cowardly, taught them.
However you look at it,
there are only two ways to
defeat terrorists.
One, by force _ as the
British authorities did,
dismantling a plan that
could have cost thousands
of lives. And two, through
the world's mass media. If
we do not convince these
young Muslims aspiring to
martyrdom that we, who live
in America and Europe, are
not the bad guys, nothing
will ever change.
That struggle of ideas
is the one we are losing.
Nobody is telling those
youngsters who we really
are. And what they see in
Iraq and Lebanon makes them
even more radical.
There is terror in the
air (when we board a plane)
because there is confusion
on the ground. The war on
terror has nothing to do
with the decision of the
United States and Britain
to declare war on Iraq.
Nothing.
The war against al-Qaida
and the Taliban in
Afghanistan was justified
retaliation for the deaths
of almost 3,000 on Sept.
11, 2001. But invading Iraq
and toppling Saddam Hussein
was something quite
different.
For many Americans, that
war is unjustifiable.
According to a recent
ABC/Washington Post survey,
62 percent of Americans do
not approve of the way
President George W. Bush's
administration is handling
the war in Iraq. Almost
2,600 American soldiers and
more than 30,000 Iraqi
civilians have died. And
those numbers keep growing.
When they couldn't find
weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq, they made up a
different excuse: that the
real objective was to take
democracy to the Arab
world. Well, that hasn't
been achieved either.
"A low-intensity civil
war and a de facto division
of Iraq is probably more
likely at this stage than a
successful and substantial
transition to a stable
democracy," said British
Ambassador William Patey,
before recently leaving his
post in Baghdad.
The war in Iraq has
multiplied, not diminished,
the terrorist threats.
Let's not confuse
things. The war in Iraq,
despite everything we hear
every day, should not be
the highest priority; it
has simply been a very
costly and lethal
diversion.
The real war that needs
to be won is the war
against the terrorists
trying to destroy our way
of life and our way of
travel. That, for sure, is
a war we can all support.