uo.GIF (2450 bytes)


 
puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
english_2.gif (2294 bytes)
PRESENTA SU
NUEVO LIBRO
LOS PRESIDENCIABLES
 


 
 
PRESENTA SU
NUEVO LIBRO
TIERRA DE TODOS
 


Me Parezco Tanto a Mi Mamá/Me Parezco Tanto a Mi Papá

 

"EL REGALO DEL TIEMPO"  

 
SUS OTROS EXITOS:
"MORIR EN EL INTENTO"
 

 
 
"LA OLA LATINA"

"ATRAVESANDO FRONTERAS" puntito.jpg (476 bytes)

AtravesandoFronterassm.jpg (2584 bytes)
puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
"A LA CAZA DEL LEON" puntito.jpg (476 bytes)

portadacazaleon.jpg (3968 bytes)
puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
"LA OTRA CARA DE AMERICA" puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
laotracara.jpg (2492 bytes) puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
"LO QUE VI" puntito.jpg (476 bytes)

puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
"DETRAS DE LA MASCARA" puntito.jpg (476 bytes)


puntito.jpg (476 bytes)
   
english.gif (1153 bytes) ojos.jpg (11358 bytes)

Columns by Jorge Ramos

NO END IN SIGHT FOR UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS  

May 10, 2010

Distributed by The New York Times Syndicate
"My father died today in Mexico," read a message I received a few days ago on my Twitter account, "and I couldn't go, because there is no immigration reform that will allow me to go and come back." The writer isn't alone; this is a common predicament, and there seems to be no end in sight. The White House and Democratic leaders in Congress don't want to say publicly, definitively, that millions of undocumented immigrants will not be legalized this year. But all signs seem to point to the fact that absolutely nothing is going to change in 2010.
The failed terrorist attack in New York on May 1 could not have happened at a worse moment. The car bomb in Times Square didn't kill anyone, but it seriously damaged efforts to revive the immigration debate in Congress.
Let's be clear. The vast majority of immigrants in the U.S. are neither terrorists nor criminals. But congressmen who are already opposed to immigration reform now have a new excuse to reject it: How could they possibly legalize millions of foreigners when one of them -- Faisal Shahzad -- tried to murder American citizens? The attempted attack in New York hasn't exactly encouraged an open conversation about legalization.
Neither have the recent developments in Arizona. Gov. Jan Brewer and 17 state senators sent a clear message when they passed the new anti-immigrant law in April: They believe undocumented immigrants are responsible for Arizona's rising crime rates. And 51 percent of Americans approve of the law, according to a New York Times/CBS poll.
But the notion that immigrants in the U.S. have increased crime rates is utterly false. Between 1999 and 2006, crime rates fell by 13 percent in the 19 states with the greatest number of immigrants (including Arizona) -- while, in the rest of the country, crime rates dropped by just 7 percent, according to the Immigration Policy Center.
The number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. doubled between 1994 and 2004, reaching roughly 12 million; but during that time, the incidence of violent crimes dropped by 35 percent and house robberies by 25 percent, according to data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. More immigrants did not lead to more crime; in fact, quite the opposite.
The explanation is simple: Immigrants, particularly those without papers, do not want problems with the police. They respect the law just as much as, if not more than, most American citizens.
But those facts have been overshadowed by the widespread support for Arizona's anti-immigrant law, as evidenced in the national polling data, and the response to the attempted Times Square bombing. We're in no shape to begin a fair immigration debate in Washington, and the 60 votes necessary to pass immigration reform in the Senate simply aren't there.
Only the intervention of a strong and determined president could change that.
But I haven't seen any signs that Barack Obama will use the full weight of his office to push through immigration reform before the congressional elections in November.
To be sure, he has other priorities: The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, creeping farther out to sea every day, is forcing the president to act immediately on energy reform and environmental protection.
This seems to be the worst political moment for undocumented immigrants.
All this reminds me of a lunch I had at the White House on Jan. 27, just hours before Obama's first State of the Union address. Someone asked Obama what the main difference was between being a candidate and being president.
The president stopped eating, breathed deeply, held the pause for several seconds and then told us that the main difference was that now he is responsible for maintaining the security of the country and preventing any new terrorist attacks. I was sitting beside Obama, and his grief-stricken face in that moment remains imprinted on my memory.
Having spoken to the president and his advisers many times, I'm convinced that he genuinely wants immigration reform. But I'm also afraid that political pressures and unfortunate circumstances have made him think that this is the wrong time to push for it.
Still, this begs the question: When will it finally be the right time?

  Twitter @ jorgeramosnews